Entries Tagged 'Abortion' ↓

I have not posted on this subject much. I hope the thousands of children no longer with us will forgive me. The topic, with the liberal candidates for president and the liberals in the Supreme Court, it is a dead issue. Pun intended.

But that doesn’t mean God wants us to forget we are breaking one of his Commandments on the most innocent in the world. Ann tells it like it is…again.

“No matter what other evils our citizens have voted for, we never voted for the slaughter of 40 million babies. Liberals call them fetuses. You never hear a pregnant mother say to her child, “Come listen to your little brother fetus, Johnny.” And women don’t have ‘fetus showers’.

Abortion clinics are not abortion clinics. Liberals call them ‘health clinics’. One liberal abortion clinic worker told the NY Times that ‘abortion clinic’ was such an ugly phrase and she wanted the name changed to ‘a place of healing and care.’ Yeah, except for the innocent baby sleeping in its mother’s womb – which they are going to kill.

Also, kill is another word we are not allowed to use when it comes to abortion. You can kill a book proposal. You can kill an ABC docudrama that doesn’t reflect well on Bill Clinton. You can kill crabgrass.

But one thing that cannot be killed apparently is a baby in the womb. That’s called ‘terminating pregnancy.’

Abortion is called everything under the sun, except abortion. It’s a ‘procedure’, a ‘choice’, a ‘reproductive health procedure’. What other precious Constitutional right are we not allowed to call by its name?

The New York Times refuse to call ‘partial birth abortion’ by its name. They insist saying, “what opponents call a partial birth abortion.” What would supporters call it?

Like it is a sense of accuracy that drove the media’s locutions on this.

What it is – is the pulling all of a live baby feet first from the womb, puncturing the skull and sucking the brains out.

‘Partial birth abortion IS the euphemism’.”

I seriously can’t believe this is a subject for debate. That shows how far we have fallen as a society. Thank a liberal. - Hank Dagny

More wisdom from the Maha-Rushie!

“Liberals stand for liberalism above all else. And when they do, it is people who get hurt. [Ed. Note: Our friend Pam over at Atlas Shrugged forgot this for a minute when she wondered why Jews were voting for Barack KKK God Damn America Koran Hussein Obama. I told her the truth, echoed here by Rush.]

And when liberals stray from the reservation – like Lieberman or Zel Miller, they kick them out. They don’t call them ‘mavericks’ in the drive-by media. They don’t say, ‘this is great! Look at the diversity in our party.’

That is a great illustration. Diversity – a great liberal principle. Well, there isn’t any when it comes down to actual impact on people. They don’t allow any diversity in the Democrat Party. They don’t allow it in speech. [Ed. Note: The Liberty Pundit captures liberals showing their intolerance of ‘free speech’. To be fair, the conservative protest did hit the liberals right in their religious altar - abortion. Nothing sets off a liberal more than trying to prevent babies from being murdered.]

When they enforce their principle, someone is going to get hurt. Someone is going to be guilty. Some organization or person is always going to be “not diverse” enough. [Ed. Note: Think about that for a second in the context of liberals running the entire government. People being ‘rounded up’ for failure to be ‘diverse enough.’]

“Diversity” means nothing! It is a principle based on how something looks – which we are not supposed to judge anyone on the way it looks. [Ed. Note: Yet another direct liberal contradiction – of which there are hundreds]. Because of the way something looks liberals want to change everything – and people get hurt.

Liberalism happens under the umbrella of ‘we care.’ And that is why it is so seductive - especially to ignorant people. And especially people who care that other people care about people.

We all care about people! Except a small minority – and most of those are in jail or heading there. We are the most generous nation in the world. Not only for our own people, but for people around the world.

So conservatives are said to be harsh and can’t possibly care. The liberals have a cool game going. Let me give you an example:

Liberals have as a principle ‘quality education for all’, with more and more money spent every year. May I ask you, what is the state of our current education system? What is the dropout rate – especially among minorities? How many people graduate and cannot read their diplomas? Quality education for all?

But you have to stay in a failing public school system. If you want vouchers – if you want to get your children into private schools - and someone offers that suggestion – look who stands in your way!

Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, Mr. and Mrs. Gore can send their kids to private school. You can’t do it. You have to keep your kids is a failing public school system so the principle of a ‘quality education for everyone’ can be followed.

They talk about a quality education for everyone because ‘liberals care.’ Look at the status of public education. Look at the effect on people – who are ‘subject’ to this principle. And when you confront liberals with this, they say, ‘you can’t examine the results. You have to examine our good intentions. We care.’”

The liberal citizen may care, but the Democrat politician does not care about people. They care about power.

The dumbing down of the US citizenry serves the purposes of feeding the teachers unions who in turn feed the DNC coffers; making more and more Americans dependent on the government; and makes liberal talking points appear to make sense. Only the ignorant think liberalism works.

A Democrat politician is a traitor to this nation – pure and simple. – Hank Dagny

According to the article in the USA – Al Jazeera Today by Stephanie Armour , “almost fifty babies have spent their infancy in the office beside their mothers or fathers at the T3 advertising firm.

[Ed. Note: I guarantee ‘fathers’ was thrown in for PC reasons, as no self-respecting man would take his infant to work. Note to companies doing business with this firm; maybe T3’s prices are high for this reason?]

Almost eighty companies across the nation allow babies in the workplace according to Parenting in the Workplace Institute in Framingham, Mass.”

Parenting in the Workplace Institute? Come on. Did Ted Kennedy get the federal funding for this insanity?

The article did go on to say, “Those without children often come to resent the perception of coddled working parents,’ says Tory Johnson, CEO of Women for Hire, a NY based professional recruitment services firm.

Question: Would a “Men for Hire” company be considered sexist? Just asking.

You don’t say, Tory. By the way, can I order one of your women “my way”, like Eliot Spitzer?

Just because the workers without kids would have to pick up the slack in the workplace is no reason for them to hold a grudge or be upset right, Tory? After all, it takes a village – and apparently paychecks without earning them – to raise a child.

If we are going to go that far, shouldn’t the next logical step be for the woman to conceive the child at her desk? Husband optional, after all, what if he doesn’t have clearance to get into the building? And we can’t deny women this most basic human right of pro-creation.

And fair is fair. Men at work should have the same right. Maybe Tory’s clients would be available as once again security clearance could be an issue at some employers.

And – if the woman changes her mind and decides maybe she doesn’t want the copy repairman to be the father of her child – what self respecting employer would be caught dead (pun intended) without a 1st class abortion clinic on the premises.

Make them, kill them or raise them – and never leave your cubicle. Liberal heaven - since they don’t believe in the real one or they wouldn’t kill babies anyway.

What happened to actually doing your job and making the company profitable? In the liberal world - “Uh, try and work that in, if it’s not a bother.”

And liberals still don’t get why socialism-communism-liberalism doesn’t work (literally). – Hank Dagny

I’m using my hotel-delivered USA Al-Jazeera Today for content again. Liberalism dropped outside my door like a lit bag of manure for me to step in. Unfortunately for the liberals who dropped it, I am smart enough to know what it is and send it back where it came from with my words on this blog.

Front Page: Oscars goes on in spite of the writer’s strike.

First of all, why are the Oscars top headline news when our military victories on TWO fronts are ignored? I can already rest my case for liberal un-American bias. And where is the solidarity of all these commie actors with the commie writers? Is a statue so you can make more money in your next picture more important than your union brethren on the picket line? Apparently so you gold plated hypocrites.

Second headline is about the ‘recession’ I predicted for 2007 hitting in 2008. Ok, I missed it by one month. I’ll take a prediction made nine years ago being one month off as a win.

Page 3: For liberals, the 35th anniversary of the unconstitutional Roe v Wade ruling is like Christmas is to the rest of us. Pro-lifers marched on Washington by the thousands to protest this sinful, murderous and unconstitutional law. This is another reason why the next election is so important.

The liberal fossil Supreme Court judges will retire en masse if a Democrat gets the White House. Safe in the knowledge that future communist judges will be appointed to mold the Constitution into what they think it should be – ignoring the rules in the Constitution as to how the document is supposed to be changed. Like Roe v Wade. They are holding on to their chairs now under orders from the DNC not to retire until the Czarina takes over. Otherwise the liberal altar of baby killing may get reversed.

I saw a blog article by some feminist cheering the aniversary of the murder of millions of innocent babies - and I have it for my destruction in a post soon. I already destroyed a male baby-killer advocate and semi-famous liberal, Brian Elroy McKinley, in past posts. You can do a search on this site and find it.

But I have to destroy the abortion altar of the liberals every so often – just as our military has to kill attackers of our country every so often. Evil never rests you know.

Also on page 3, they report a crackdown on panhandling going on nationwide. Could it be that even liberals are getting tired of beggars? I hate them because it is annoying and also is an excuse to get close to a potential mugging victim. Liberals hate it because it trips their ‘guilt and self-loathing’ trigger.

The late comedian Sam Kinison had the solution in a comedy skit and didn’t know it. Shoot the homeless and beggars!

If they are not smart enough to find a job, marry someone who has a job, stay in good standing with some member of their family or church, or are not smart enough to find community shelters or sign up for the federal, state and local assistance programs - they have to go.

Sam said that once the first one is capped, the rest will miraculously find ways to get off the streets and out of our faces. Sounds absolutely correct in theory. – Hank Dagny

Back in December, Nancy Pelosi made the statement that “Republicans like war, which is why they want the War in Iraq to continue.” When asked to clarify her statement, she realized she had her high heel in her mouth and backed off saying she meant Republicans “support the war.”

We got it the first time, Nancy. Conservatives support victory over our enemies – in stark contrast to Democrats who support our surrender.

Democrats also passed a measure banning water-boarding. The fact those 35 seconds of this tactic made a terrorist spill his guts, over dozen plots – that were all thwarted. This saved countless American lives. Liberals could care less.

Our citizens have been burned alive, crashed from airplanes into buildings and the ground, forced to jump from skyscrapers to their deaths, beheaded, shot, blown up, and their bodies dragged through streets.

But the comfort and safety of the enemy that does these horrible things to their countrymen, is more important to liberals than American lives are.

We don’t love war, Nancy. We like our freedom and we know it must be defended with the blood of our heroes and our enemies.

We like victory over our enemies and over liberals – which are one in the same.

Conservatives don’t like war. But liberals like killing babies before their born.

How does that sound, Nancy? – Hank Dagny

Why don’t Americans have children anymore?

I’m going to list the reasons I was thinking of. I can do this because I am as guilty as anyone for this problem in the country. I only have two children and talked my wife into stopping there. Here we go:

1. They are (were) too expensive to house
2. They are (were) too expensive to educate
3. They are (were) too expensive to clothe
4. They are too expensive to feed
5. They are too expensive to kick start into independence

Those are my reasons. Remember, at the age you are having them (like me) you are not making as much money as you did later in life – so money is a factor. There are other reasons, but I will let your add to the list if you want to. So, I can’t put the blame on Western women and feminism – at least I can’t. Abortion has not helped the situation, but I don’t think it is the cause of our problem.

If you look around, the problem is everywhere in the more civilized cultures;

“When it comes to forecasting the future, the birthrate is the nearest thing to hard numbers. If only a million babies are born in 2006, it’s hard to have two million adults enter the workforce in 2026.

And the hard data on babies around the Western world is that they’re running out a lot faster than the oil is. ‘Replacement’ fertility rate-i.e., the number you need for merely a stable population, not getting any bigger, not getting any smaller-is 2.1 babies per woman.

Some countries are well above that: the global fertility leader, Somalia, is 6.91, Niger 6.83, Afghanistan 6.78, Yemen 6.75. Notice what those nations have in common?

Scroll way down to the bottom of the Hot One Hundred top breeders and you’ll eventually find the United States, hovering just at replacement rate with 2.07 births per woman.

Ireland is 1.87, New Zealand 1.79, Australia 1.76. But Canada’s fertility rate is down to 1.5, well below replacement rate; Germany and Austria are at 1.3, the brink of the death spiral; Russia and Italy are at 1.2; Spain 1.1, about half replacement rate. That’s to say, Spain’s population is halving every generation. By 2050, Italy’s population will have fallen by 22%, Bulgaria’s by 36%, Estonia’s by 52%… The latter half of the decline and fall of great civilizations follows a familiar pattern: affluence, softness, decadence, extinction… A society that has no children has no future.” -Mark Steyn

The problem is liberalism – or socialism – or high costs, mostly due to tax policies. When people must give their income to the nanny state, they stop being as big a nanny themselves.

Forget feminism - women enter the workforce ‘because it is too expensive’ to make it on one paycheck. It is when over half of the average American paycheck ends up paying a tax of some kind. The taxes are worse in other nations – and notice their birth rates are even lower.

Ignoring Feminism and the Selfish Baby Boomer Syndrome – which contributed nicely – it is taxes that are driving us extinct. – Hank Dagny

Technorati Tags: Tax Rates, Birth Rates, America Alone, Me Generation

This is a leftist man-hating penis-envy site, built for the ugly, over-weight, bi-sexual, gay, communist and socialist females out there in the blogasphere. These women truly don’t want equality – they want all the rules purely in the female’s favor.

My posts on that site are not posted as they filter everything that appears. They have to as their positions and statements on this site are too childish to defend in an honest discussion. The first clue you are dealing with liberals.

This hate of men is just natural with these women. So is the avoidance of reality. Somehow they find the literal torture and abuse of women in this country, but totally ignore it around the world. After all, they are against doing anything to the biggest oppressors of women in the world – Islamic Fascists. This is a totally contradictory position that can only make total sense to a liberal.

All of this because these women cannot accept the fact that men can kill them whenever they want to. I didn’t say men should or that it is legal, but facts are facts; women survive on this earth because men let them. Women have ‘rights’ on this earth because men let them. Again, I am not saying women should not be treated fairly and have rights, but facts are facts. What they have, men allowed. These broads at Feministing can’t deal with it.

Let me give you a couple of sample of the utter stupidity of this site;

1. The Duke rape case and Nyfong was discussed. A reader posted, “Nifong did so much damage to the credibility of women, and women of color and sex workers specificially, with the way that he handled this case. It’s pretty disgusting, and a public apology doesn’t undo the damage.”

What? This is feminist logic at it’s finest. The woman in this case gets off scot-free in their eyes.

I think females did more damage to the credibility of females than Nyfong did.
Liberals did more damage to the credibility of liberals than Nyfong did.
Race baiting leaders did more damage to the credibility of race baiters than Nyfong.
Nyfong damaged prosecutors and our legal system, but not as badly as liberals in government do.

2. They are upset that someone in Ohio is ‘pushing’ a bill (no pun intended) where women would have to get the man’s permission for an abortion. Of course, at this site the right for only the woman to choose to murder her baby is hers and hers alone.

Follow the feminist logic here.
A woman – equal to a man in every way – decides jointly with a man to have intercourse.
After the act the woman gets pregnant. Now according to feminists, this is what is fair:
She can kill their baby at any time.
She can kill their baby and make the taxpayers pay.
She can have it and give it away.
She can have it and sell it.
She can have it and make him pay.
She can have it and make the taxpayers pay.
She can have it, move far, far away so he can’t see his child and make him pay.

Even though it was a joint decision to ‘get it on’, only she gets to say what happens after, including apparently falsely crying rape – as after all only the prosecutor would be to blame.

To defeat the feminist argument that “it is her body!” - it was his body that had a 50% ‘hand?’ (joke intended) in what happened.

And if you want to play the argument that possession is 9/10th of the law, then he should not have to pay a cent to raise the child or pay for the abortion, and the same with the government. After all, the all-equal woman made her decisions.

It is too easy to show that feminists are angry hypocrites and that liberalism is a mental illness. – Hank Dagny

A liberal non-profit group from the San Francisco bay area called EXHALE has come up with a new line of electronic sympathy cards for women who had abortions. After abortion sympathy cards.

One of the cards say, “As you grieve, remember you are loved.” Wait a minute! I thought an abortion was the removal of a disease – an unwanted tissue mass. What is there to grieve about? I’m confused.

Another card assures women that “they did the right thing.” There is even a religious card stating “God will never leave you or forsake you.”

These gems are available in both Spanish and English.

EXHALE is going to publish a magazine with article, poems, letters and rituals from women who have practiced in the sacrament of liberalism.

There are only six cards available right now, so there is plenty of room for market growth. Rush Limbaugh and I suggest these:

“Happy Abortion Day”
“Happy Abortion Anniversary”
“Happy Getting Back to the Bars Day”
“Happy Maybe I Can Get My Man Back Day”

What about cards for the doctors who provided the service?

“Great job! See you next time.”
“I’m telling all my friends about you.”
“Thanks for letting my manicurist work at the same time.”

What about the person who is no longer with us. What about cards for them?

“Good bye and good luck”
“Wish you were here, just in someone else.”

What about t-shirts?

“I was donated for stem-cell research.”
“I too would EXHALE, if I was still alive.”

Plenty of room for a full line of products. Business tip: Don’t expand too fast, EXHALE. Afterall, the more customers you have, the less customers you will have later. - Hank Dagny

Hat tip to the great Rush Limbaugh.

We will hear this term used ad nauseum thru the elections in 2008.

I would like someone to list them for me. As a man, I have no clue.

Except for liberal women’s favorite pastime and addiction to the ability to commit murder of a human being within their own body - known as abortion - and for other people to pay for it, I don’t know of any ‘women’s issues’. And I doubt even this issue is even desired by half the women in this country.

Ok, ladies and liberals - let’s have a list. I challenged the man-haters at “Feministing” to make a list, so I could make a list of ‘men’s issues’.

One major men’s issue is that a law should be passed making it a 2 year felony for a wife to talk to her husband during sporting events - unless asked a direct question like; “Hey babe, can you bring me a beer?”

I may have to re-think this. Afterall, she should be able to bring it and not say a word. Of course hearing her say, “Is there anything else I can do for you, Lord of the Castle?” is nice too. - Hank Dagny

Continuing the series of an honest debate between conservatism and liberalism.

That last communist desire by Kay ended a very long paragraph of diatribe. So she started another. In this next one, which also has to be broken up into sections, Kay continues on her desire for communism and her hate for the United States – all under the guise of caring more about her fellow human beings than conservatives.

The fact that human beings – including America’s poor – live better here than anywhere else in the world, is ignored by Kay. She wants us torn down to their level because it is ‘unfair’. I told you liberalism is a mental disorder. Kay proves it.

Kay: [Meanwhile, many conservatives I have met usually espouse on one or more programs and policies that are mainly self-serving – including the reduction or the elimination of taxes, protection of the status quo and states rights irrespective of societal inequities.]

Self-serving policies, in Kay’s world are policies that give rights to the individual. These rights are to live in freedom, keep the spoils of his toils and live with minimum government intervention. In other word, the self-serving policy Kay hates is our very Constitution.

No conservative wants all taxes eliminated. Every liberal wants taxes raised – on the ‘rich’ guy. The rich guy is someone outperforming and out-earning them. Once again our Constitution spells out exactly what government is supposed to spend our tax dollars on, but thanks to liberals in both our major parties – 60% of the money taken from citizens and spent by the government is done unconstitutionally - illegally, if you will – and that is fine with liberals. Actually it is not fine. Liberals want more of your property turned over to them.

Protecting the ‘status quo’ means defending our Constitution. Kay cannot have that as a communist – masquerading as an American liberal. The Constitution can be legally changed (a note added for all of you educated in a government school and those in Ann Arbor, MI.), but liberalism fails when voted on – either by the citizens or by our representatives when it is out in the open because they know they will lose in the next election. So liberals – again in both of our major parties – operate thru illegal bill amendments and false reasons as to what the law is truly for – all approved by liberal judges packed place by fellow liberals.

Lastly, Kay freely admits that the term “United States of America” means nothing to her. The fact that individual (there is that word liberals hate again) states may have rights, despite ‘societal inequties’, is an abomination to her.

If this cowardly liberal had actually followed thru with this debate, I would have asked her to elaborate. I can only guess that she secretly means she does not want each state deciding the issue of abortion. Why liberals have a fascination with killing babies in the womb is one of the mysteries of our time – at least for me. I don’t get the love liberals have for slaughtering human beings. After all, liberal policies throughout history have murdered more people than anything else on this earth.

Isn’t it ‘rich’ that she thinks she is the one who cares more about people than us mean old conservatives? – Hank Dagny