Entries Tagged 'Abortion' ↓

Colleges hand out pamphlets to women listing measures you can take to prevent rape and sexual assault. Fantastic idea.

http://www.ncf.ca/freenet/rootdir/menus/sigs/life/feminism/safety/rape.prev

I got to thinking. Shouldn’t there be a pamphlet to prevent abortion and murder?

God prepared this pamphlet: ABORTION AND MURDER

Abortion Protective Measures

Abortion is a violent murder, an invasion, and a frightening experience. Abortion affects all fetuses, no matter what their age, race or economic status.  All fetuses are potential victims, no matter how long they have been forming. By being aware, a fetus can reduce the likelihood of becoming an abortion victim.  This does not mean all abortions can be prevented. Remember, women commit abortions - NOT FETUSES.

Psychological Preparedness
1. Accept the fact that you are a potential abortion victim. Many fetuses operate under the illusion that it will never ‘happen to me,’ thinking ‘my mommy will protect me.’
2. Educate yourself concerning abortion prevention tactics – like not forming in a tramp-like liberal woman in the first place and try to build some personal responsibility in your woman.
3. Become familiar with community abortion prevention techniques by not forming in liberal women. Become aware of locations and situations where abortion is more likely to occur, like California, New York, Massachusetts and Ann Arbor, Michigan.
In a Dating/Friend/Democrat Protest Situation

The vast majority of abortions that occur are termed “inconvenient time” abortions.

1. Trust your feelings. If you think you are located in a liberal, self-centered, selfish woman, do not form.

2. Don’t worry about hurting the sperm’s feelings.
3. If possible, start’morning sickness’ type symptoms on the onset of health card exchanges, heavy drinking and foreplay.
In a Car

1. Try to keep her knees and thighs locked.
2. If you should be followed into your area, stay in the ovary with the door locked.
3. Sound the “call him the wrong first name” alarm to get the intruder to back off.
4. Check the horniness of your woman before venturing out of the ovary.
On the Street

1. Be observant of things around you. 

2. If someone is hitting on your liberal woman, hit you’re nearest ‘cramps’ button.
3. Travel only near the end of the cycle if possible. Avoid short trips out during the early and middle parts of the month.
4. Don’t go out with friends if at all possible. Twins or triplets rarely give pause, and usually guarantee the attack.
5. If sperm approaches you, scream and run in the direction opposite of the one the sperm is going.
In Your Uterus

1. The best lock cannot function if you fail to lock it. Be sure to keep her knees closed.
2. All visitors should have a secure rubber suit. If not – see #4 above.
3. Never open the knees unless the wedding ceremony has been performed and your woman has stated she wants to be a real woman and a responsible mother. 
If You Are About to Be Aborted

The best resistance you can use against an attacker is their sense of right and wrong.  Think!  Don’t panic.  The most important element to remember is that you are not trying to fight your liberal woman, but are attempting to divert the woman long enough to get born. Always look for a way to be born.

1.  Stay calm.  Do not do anything that may upset your attacker.

2.  Try to convince the attacker to put the abortion clinic phone number down.

3.  Talk to your attacker, show sympathy and understanding. Promise not to cry or be hungry if you are born.
4.  Make the attacker see you as an individual, not as an object.

Checklist for Victims of Abortion

Report the crime immediately to God, even though He knows already.
That about covers it. I thought it was a great analogy. Women are the victims of rape by mean and immoral men preying on the weak for their own selfish reasons. The fetus is a victim of abortion for the exact same reasons.

Allegedly women are completely innocent in all ‘rape’ scenarios. We know the fetus truly is innocent in all abortions. - Hank Dagny

I got a dollar that says these two parents are Clinton voters. Any takers?

“A Maine couple, upset that their 19-year-old daughter was pregnant, tied her up, loaded her in their car and began driving to New York to force her to get an abortion, police say.

The daughter escaped at a shopping center. The parents were arraigned on kidnapping charges. “The daughter told me that her parents told her she had no choice but to get an abortion,’ a Salem police officer wrote in a court affidavit.”

The USA Today only had this tiny blurb in their paper about some parents trying to force their daughter to have an abortion.

Had this been parents kidnapping their daughter over state lines to prevent her from having a legal abortion, well it would of been front page news and on the cable news shows until the trial was over. Trust me on that. This USA Today blurb is the last and only mention of this you will see in the MSPAM (main stream press and media).

Now is liberals were consistant, these Clinton voters should be charged with attempted murder also. The woman wanted to have the baby and they were attempting to do the baby in. Liberals will not go there however. But some time ago a young man was convicted of murder by punching his girlfriend in the stomach to start a miscarriage - even with the woman’s consent he do this. The woman of course was not charged with anything of course - due to liberal logic on abortion.

Liberals are just twisted - are they not? Interesting these parents were running to Hillary’s liberal mecca to get the deed done. As Ann Coulter says, “Liberalism is a religion and abortion is the altar.” - Hank Dagny

Vox Day had an interesting take on abortion. I post this not for the ‘Americans who happen to be Black, Jewish or a little weak’. They know abortion is not only an abomination, but bad constitutional law.

But I am very curious as to how the ‘Black, Jewish and liberal people who happened to have been born in the United States but quit being Americans’ would feel about discussing this compromise proposal:

“Since 1.295 million abortions per year isn’t enough (for the left), I suggest the federal government begin a campaign to increase that number, beginning with blacks and Jews.

After all, the two groups are the strongest supporters of the Abortion Party (the Democratic Party), so there’s no reason why they shouldn’t be the first to benefit from the wonders of their favorite procedure.” - Vox Day

I see only one problem with this. The Democrats would have to increase their ‘dead people’ voting block. Democratic districts would have 50,000 people vote at the polls and 500, 000 vote absentee (all for Democrats with only 3,000 of them actually alive, with only 500 of those not stoned, drunk or high. Non-Democrat ballots would be lost).

Mental note to invest in a printing franchise if this compromise ever happens. Naw, that wouldn’t help either as the Democrats who won would tax and regulate me into bankruptcy. - Hank Dagny

Rush Limbaugh, on his fantastic “Morning Updates”, tells us the glorious news!

“Seemingly out of nowhere, South Dakota has jumped into the headlines. The state Senate just approved legislation banning abortion, except when a woman’s life is in danger. In a state with near political parity, the main sponsor of the bill is a Democrat, and a woman: Senator Julie Bartling. Who said: “It is time for the South Dakota Legislature to…protect the lives and rights of unborn children.”

The vote on the bill — which would ban all abortions except when a mother’s life is threatened, and hand out prison terms to doctors who violate the law — was 23-12 in the South Dakota Senate; it passed in their House 47-22. Who are these pro-life Democrats? In the Alito and Roberts hearings, did you see one such Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, in the US Senate, on TV, or in print anywhere? No! If you look at Democrat conventions, you’d think there aren’t any pro-life Democrats. They won’t even let them speak if they do show up.

One last point: If this issue is “settled law,” as Democrats constantly say, why in the world is it coming up at all, anywhere? Why does it keep coming up? I’ll tell you why, because there is nothing settled about it. Not even among Democrats.” - Rush

The voting looked awful one-sided too. Liberal Lou [a sometimes liberal contributor here and the writer of a blog that is too coward to take comments] is fond of saying the right to abortion would win in a landslide.

A liberal wrong yet again. It would not even win in a landslide if only registered Democrats voted on it. It might even fail if the God-fearing Dems all got to the polls.

As Rush asks, “How must it feel to be a liberal?’ Never happy, always mad, always wrong and wondering why they are never right.

I’d feel sorry for them if they were not endangering my freedoms with their lunacy. - Hank Dagny

Now I know I could throw ‘Democrat’ and ‘Voters’ completely out of the above title and all the men would say, “Yeah…AND?” But liberal women are even more frustrating than your typical woman.

Liberal women never move off of their ‘feelings’ about things. They don’t even change the subject when losing and or get louder. They don’t even threaten to punch you in the nose.

When liberal women are faced with proof against their arguments for liberalism (their ‘feelings’), they just refuse to discuss it any further. They just turn off their information gathering skills (insert sexist remark here guys like …What information gathering skills?). It never occurs to them to ‘rethink’ their position. They know what they ‘feel’ and that is as far as it needs to go.

Fourputt and I were in a pub having a few adult beverages, smoking cigars, watching football and discussing whether or not beer should be it’s own ‘basic food’ group. A waitress (not ours) came up and told me that my hat was not very nice. I was proudly wearing my baseball cap that says “Repeal the 19th Amendment”.

For those of you in Ann Arbor, MI and to our actual waitress at the time the statement was made, the 19th Amendment gave the women of the United States the right to vote. This gave the Democrats a whole new core of voters who don’t think things thru, don’t care about the Constitution and only want to know ‘what can you as a politician do for me’?

Anyway, here is my conversation with the waitress - Jenny - who didn’t like my hat;

J: “Your hat is not very nice.”
HD: “But it is needed to save the country. Women usually vote Democrat. Women will usually vote for socialism without realizing it. Did you vote in the last election?”
J: “Yes. I voted for Kerry.”
HD: “See what I mean? Why did you vote for him?”
J: “I liked his position on the issues.”
HD: “He never once actually stated his position on the issues. He said he would tell us after the…”
J: “Yes I know, but Bush is just too stupid and…”
HD: “Just a second. Bush graduated from Harvard - same as Kerry - and had better grades.”
J: “Yes. I know. But I am pro-choice and I think Bush will try to change that.”
HD: “Don’t women make their choice when they open their legs for a man? Aren’t they deciding to…”
J: “Yes. But I have a friend who got pregnant and it was not a good time for her.”
HD: “Well, couldn’t she put the baby up for adoption? There are many families that…”
J: “Yes. I know. I have another friend that did that. It’s just that…I don’t know. I’ll be right back.”

Notice she didn’t disagree with anything I said, nor could she counter my comments, nor did she have a compelling argument to vote for Kerry or kill babies prior to birth. But the marketed ‘right to choose’ argument by Democrats feels right to her.

When she did return, Fourputt asked Jenny if she would vote for Hillary in the next election. Jenny said with a quizzical look, “I’m not sure. I didn’t think so because of the way she let Bill treat her with the Lewinski affair.”

So, she may pick her next president based on the way the one candidate handled the extra marital affair of her spouse? I rest my case.

PS: My opinion, Jenny will vote for Hillary – or whatever Democrat is running anyway. She feels more powerful being able to murder her child if she chooses to. Killing babies good – standing by your husband who strayed bad.

To Democrats, the right to kill babies IS a liberal’s most important issue. Why a made up right to kill is so important to liberals is a mystery. It has to be the fact they bastardized the Constitution with an activist leftist court to pass the law and it was their blueprint for bigger things. - Hank Dagny-LQ

You can look all you want to, but there is no right to an abortion to be found in the Constitution. However liberals want to take away some of the rights that are in there - such as the right to bear arms and the right not to have one’s own property seized.

Abortion was allowed by the Supreme Court under the ‘right to privacy’. Privacy? That would not even make sense if there was actually a ‘right to privacy’ in the Constitution.

Bill Clinton said in one of his many trips to the middle in order to get elected said, “Abortion should be safe, legal and rare.” This is the great hero of the Democratic Party talking. So all you liberals follow along closely and answer this quiz. See how many prezels you need to turn yourself into in order to answer it.
But first, let’s set the foundation.

How can an unalienable right be legal, safe or rare? The fact that it is a God - given right, means it is more than legal. And safe? How could you make a right safe? A person, a town, a city, a state and a country all do their best, but even God cannot keep you safe against everything. People have free will. Sometimes their will is to hurt others.

So let’s throw ‘legal’ and ’safe’ out of the exam. That leaves ‘rare’. Let’s begin the quiz:

1. Should the right to life be rare?
2. Should the right to liberty be rare?
3. Should the right to the pursuit of happiness be rare? The Bill of Rights are legal because they are in the Constitution.
4. Should the right to worship a religion be rare?
5. Should the right to free speech be rare?
6. Should the right of a free press be rare?
7. Should the right to assembly be rare?
8. Should the right to redress grievances to the government be rare?
9. Should the right to bear arms be rare?
10. Should the right to be secure in your own home and property be rare?
11. Should the right against self incrimination be rare?
12. Should the right to not be put in jeopardy for the same offense twice be rare?
13. Should the right to not have property seized for public good be rare?
14. Should the right to a speedy trial by an impartial jury be rare?
15. Should the right of no excessive bail be required be rare?
16. Should the right to no excessive fines be rare?
17. Should the right to no cruel and unusual punishments be rare?
18. Should the right to not be a slave be rare?
Conservatives answer all these questions with the same word - NO.

Liberals must go into paragraphs of explanations as to why some of these are difficult questions to answer with one word. And for some of the questions the liberal answer would be YES or ABOLISH IT!

THREE BONUS Essay Questions:
19. If a right is a good thing - and we all agree they are - why would you want it to be rare?

In order for the ‘right’ to an abortion can become a legitimate legal right in the Constitution, it has to be voted on and passed by the Senate by a two-thirds majority. So,

20. Why won’t liberals let it be voted on?

21. Why do they go thru activist judges to get their agendas passed?

END OF EXAM
Because liberalism can only sneak in the back way - away from the scrutiny of the American voter.
Liberalism fails this and all tests - AGAIN.

Rarely is there anything worth reading in the NY-Al Jazeera Times, but this was ok.

David Brooks, in the NY Times:

“Justice Harry Blackmun did more inadvertent damage to our democracy than any other 20th Century American. When he and his Supreme Court colleagues issued the Roe v. Wade decision, they set off a cycle of political viciousness and counter-viciousness that has poisoned public life ever since.

When Blackmun wrote the Roe decision, it took the abortion issue out of the legislatures and put it into the courts. If it had remained in the legislatures, we would have seen a series of state-by-state compromises reflecting the views of the centrist majority that’s always existed on this issue.

These legislative compromises wouldn’t have pleased everyone, but would have been regarded as legitimate,” rather than forced on the society. Instead, Blackmun and his concurring colleagues invented a right to abortion, and imposed a solution more extreme than the policies of just about any other comparable nation.

Religious conservatives became alienated from their own government, feeling that their democratic rights had been usurped by robed elitists. Liberals lost touch with working-class Americans because they never had to have a conversation about values with those voters; they could just rely on the courts to impose their views.

The parties polarized as they each became dominated by absolutist activists. Unable to lobby for their pro-life or pro-choice views in normal ways, abortion activists focused their attention on judicial nominations. Dozens of groups on the right and the left have been created to destroy nominees who might oppose their side of the fight. Each nomination battle is more vicious than the last as the methodologies of personal destruction are perfected.”

Forget for one second whether or not abortion should be the law of the land – Roe v Wade was a bastardization of our Constitution and a bypass of the citizens of the nation.

Only thing is – liberals do not care about the Constitution. – Hank Dagny